Pulsonix User Forum

Technical advice from Pulsonix engineers and the wider community.

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Help with using Pulsonix
 Schematic Design
 Component naming in hierarchical designs
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Manfred

Germany
5 Posts

Posted - 18 Jan 2018 :  10:25:05  Show Profile  Visit Manfred's Homepage  Send Manfred an AOL message  Reply with Quote
Hello,

I'm transferring a hierarchical design from Eagle to Pulsonix.
Eagle used a hierarchical naming system for the parts e.g. input.type1.R27.
Pulsonix uses a flat naming system e.g all resistors are just named Rx.

Is there a way to tell Pulsonix to use a hierarchical naming system ?

Personally I find the flat system better, but to rename all components would require a load of changes in the documentation.

Many thanks

Manfred

steve

United Kingdom
316 Posts

Posted - 18 Jan 2018 :  11:18:35  Show Profile  Visit steve's Homepage  Reply with Quote
We would be interested to understand how these hierarchical references appear in the Eagle PCB.

We work our importer on what we learn about the originating systems output files, as customers highlight aspects of its format.

What is happening during/after import of your files into Pulsonix?

Can you provide the files for import to us?

You are correct in that Pulsonix uses a flat naming system.

Pulsonix Assistance
Go to Top of Page

Manfred

Germany
5 Posts

Posted - 19 Jan 2018 :  06:07:18  Show Profile  Visit Manfred's Homepage  Send Manfred an AOL message  Reply with Quote
Hi,

a big part of the PCB has to be routed new. Therefore I decided to transfer the schematic manually, draw it new in Pulsonix to get a clean start without the Eagle inheritance.

The problem is the naming of the parts there is a big and complicated documentation for every part, so the names must stay the same in the Pulsonix schematic.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Jump To: